HOME > THEORIES

THE THEORY OF THE INCREASE OF REACTIVITY > Page 3

FRANCESCO PICCIONE
________________________

THEORIES
_____________

The Theory of
The Increase of Reactivity

1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 

Publication date:
2017/23/12

PDF Version



___________________

THE THEORY OF THE INCREASE OF REACTIVITY

1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5

Continued from page 2

from my particular need: reducing the running-in times of my "passive electromagnetic devices" (my industrial invention patent No. 1415894/2015) in order to speed up the time between the different experiments.

All mechanical, electrical, electronic, electromagnetic and electromechanical components, even passive components such as solid conductors, welds, connectors, etc., need a period of running-in to achieve their settling and correct functionality. It's hard to believe, but it's like that!

But what kind of running-in is it and what duration? In fact, after the self-styled running-in, the component does not reach its correct functionality, even after years of use.

Before the discovery of this invention (but still today, as happens for example in the audio sector), the "running-in" is carried out by chance, with systems and means absolutely unsuitable, created at random or borrowed from those used by electrical engineers.
These systems are the same ones that I have been using for decades along with the "demagnetization" procedures (that many people do not believe in. But this is another story...). In the belief that they performed their running-in function adequately.

The discovery of the method has clearly highlighted the following facts:

1. the existence of the physical phenomenon of "running in" even in the infinitely small world, as is that of electrons and the flow of electrical energy;
   
2. the "importance" with which the running-in is carried out, ie that must take place according to certain methods established by this method/process;
   
3. its own "necessity", in the case that it intends to obtain the settling and the correct functionality of any technological device, solid conductors, etc..
   

This improvement results in a greater "scan" on the "content" of the flow of electricity, due both to the increase in the "separation" between the different information, and to a greater damping and control of the flow itself.

Before the "electrical stimulation" the flow of electric energy, even without the user having awareness of it, behaves as usually happens: with apparently normal propagation, that is, apathetic, lazy and lazy.
After the completion of the various cycles of electrical stimulation, the behavior of the flow of electricity radically changes, becoming more and more rapid, quick and ready in its reactions, acquiring a natural way.
This happens both because the flow meets a more efficient and faster path, and because of the absolute balance with which the "stimulation" process is carried out; and also for the consequent lower (or absence of) dissipation of energy, which the same flow follows during its journey in the same path.

Basically, this method/process allows to present to the "flow of electricity", an even more fluid path within technological devices, solid conductors, etc..
This is made possible thanks to the elimination of any obstacle (of any kind), which can come in contact with the flow itself, thus drastically reducing its energy dissipation and increasing its "capacity" of speed, promptness and reaction speed; as if he had "memorized" the route and had "trained" to do it.

I have summarized these incredible properties in:

12. The results of the long experimentation

The results of over six years of experimentations have shown that:

Furthermore, I have found that:

In fact I have been able to ascertain, a "cyclic sequence" in which the improvements are more tangible: 1, 3, 9, 12, 24, 36, 48, 72 and 100, of repetition of the whole method/process, whose duration is about 56 minutes per cycle.

It is from these results that the three "functions" of this method/process have been derived:

1. settling and correct functionality (achievement of the running-in);
   
2. performance improvement (perfect functionality);
   
3. increase in performance (maximum functionality).
   

Continued on page 4